The New York Inquirer has an interview with Keith Gessen of n+1. On the topic of his magazine’s rivalry with McSweeney’s he says:

This is where McSweeney’s and the Believer come in. When we launched, it seemed like they were the ideal representatives of a certain kind of literary position, which states that 1) reading, in any form, is good, that writing is good, that literature is good; 2) all these things are imperiled, and therefore 3) that anything done in the service of these things is good. We disagree with all three parts of that, even #2. And we’ve said so a number of times.

Tags: criticism, keith gessen, n+1